Before you accept a philosophical concept that came through a colonial language, state it in your own and see whether it still makes sense.
Kwasi Wiredu · African analytic philosophy
Philosopher
Last reviewed:
1931–2022 · African analytic philosophy · Modern
Kwasi Wiredu was a Ghanaian philosopher trained at Legon and Oxford, where he studied with Gilbert Ryle. He called for conceptual decolonisation: African thinkers should test the concepts they inherited through colonial languages, and ask whether a claim even makes sense when stated in their own language, such as Akan. He was equally firm that tradition is not true because it is old, and criticised anachronistic and authoritarian customs.
In politics he defended consensus democracy, drawing on Akan practice, against winner-takes-all party systems. He held that truth is opinion, carefully qualified: a considered view from a point of view, which drew strong objections.
Summary cards only until a checked page reference for a short sentence is available.
Philosophy and an African Culture, the essay 'How not to compare African thought with Western thought'.
It shows both edges of his method at once.
Before you accept a philosophical concept that came through a colonial language, state it in your own and see whether it still makes sense.
Kwasi Wiredu · African analytic philosophy
Conceptual decolonisation
Do not take a framework for granted because it came in English. Try it in your own language and see if it survives.
Against unexamined tradition
Old and local is no more a guarantee of truth than new and foreign.
Consensus democracy
Decisions reached by talking to agreement, not by a majority silencing a minority.
Philosophy and an African Culture (1980)
Tradition, truth, and the critique of folk thought.
Cultural Universals and Particulars (1996)
Consensus, universals, and language.
None listed in this library.
None of the lines this library files for Kwasi Wiredu is marked Questionable or Misattributed. That is only a fact about these cards. It is not a certificate that every popular sentence is theirs.
Philosophy and an African Culture, the essay 'How not to compare African thought with Western thought'. It shows both edges of his method at once.
This library does not measure fame, and it does not rank lines by how often they are shared. The first line it files for Kwasi Wiredu that is not marked Questionable or Misattributed is “Before you accept a philosophical concept that came through a colonial language, state it in your own and see whether it still makes sense.” (Cultural Universals and Particulars (1996), 'Conceptual decolonization', summary, Summary).
None of the lines this library files for Kwasi Wiredu is marked Misattributed or Questionable. That is a fact about these cards, not a certificate that every popular sentence is theirs.
Conceptual decolonisation: Do not take a framework for granted because it came in English. Try it in your own language and see if it survives.