“Whatever is dependently arisen, that is explained to be emptiness.”
Nāgārjuna · Madhyamaka
Philosopher
Last reviewed:
c. 150–250 CE · Madhyamaka · Ancient
Nāgārjuna, usually placed in the second or third century CE, is the central philosopher of Madhyamaka, the Middle Way school of Buddhist thought. The work that matters is the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, the Root Verses on the Middle Way, a tight sequence of arguments in verse. He takes the Buddha's teaching of dependent arising and argues that whatever arises in dependence lacks an independent essence.
That lack is emptiness. Emptiness is not a weird substance and not a doctrine that nothing exists. Chapter 24 answers the objection that if things are empty then the path, teaching, and ordinary action collapse. His reply is that only because things are empty of fixed nature can change and liberation make sense, and that emptiness itself is a dependent designation.
The middle way is the refusal of both 'inherently real' and 'utterly nothing'. A single famous couplet, quoted alone, is easy to turn into nihilism, which is the reading the chapter exists to block. This library stays with one pivotal verse because the argument is a sequence, and a pile of cropped lines would fake a clarity the kārikās do not offer.
One pivotal verse is cited rather than a run of isolated lines, because the Root Verses argue as a sequence and most of that sequence is not quotable without its chapter.
Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, chapter 24, with a commentary that translates 24.18 in context.
The objection that emptiness destroys the path, and his reply, is the argument people miss when they quote the verse alone.
“Whatever is dependently arisen, that is explained to be emptiness.”
Nāgārjuna · Madhyamaka
“Not from itself, not from another, not from both, and not without a cause: nowhere and never does any existing thing arise.”
Nāgārjuna · Madhyamaka
“Something that is not dependently arisen does not exist. Therefore a non-empty thing does not exist.”
Nāgārjuna · Madhyamaka
“There is not the slightest difference between cyclic existence and nirvana. There is not the slightest difference between nirvana and cyclic existence.”
Nāgārjuna · Madhyamaka
“Emptiness is proclaimed by the victorious ones as the remedy for all views. Those who take emptiness as a view are said to be incurable.”
Nāgārjuna · Madhyamaka
Emptiness
Emptiness is the lack of independent existence in whatever arises depending on other things.
Dependent arising
The verse identifies dependent arising and emptiness, rather than treating emptiness as a void behind appearances.
The middle
The position to avoid is both inherent existence and nihilism, and emptiness itself is dependently designated.
Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (c. 2nd–3rd century CE)
Root verses in twenty-seven chapters, of which 24.18 is the pivotal identification of dependent arising and emptiness.
None of the lines this library files for Nāgārjuna is marked Questionable or Misattributed. That is only a fact about these cards. It is not a certificate that every popular sentence is theirs.
Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, chapter 24, with a commentary that translates 24.18 in context. The objection that emptiness destroys the path, and his reply, is the argument people miss when they quote the verse alone.
This library does not measure fame, and it does not rank lines by how often they are shared. The first line it files for Nāgārjuna that is not marked Questionable or Misattributed is “Whatever is dependently arisen, that is explained to be emptiness.” (Mūlamadhyamakakārikā 24.18, Paraphrase or translation).
None of the lines this library files for Nāgārjuna is marked Misattributed or Questionable. That is a fact about these cards, not a certificate that every popular sentence is theirs.
Emptiness: Emptiness is the lack of independent existence in whatever arises depending on other things.