Quotation
Last reviewed:
“No treaty of peace shall be held to be valid if it was made with a secret reservation of the material for a future war.”
Immanuel Kant · Critical philosophy · Enlightenment · 1795
What does it mean?
The usual reading takes the article as a condition of honest peace: a treaty that reserves a claim, a border, a pretext, for the next war is only a truce, and calling it peace corrupts the word. He is writing preliminary articles for states, not a private rule for quarrels, though the structure is clear. A rival reading treats the demand as naive about diplomacy, in which ambiguity is the art. He thinks that art is exactly how wars are stored; The sentence is the first preliminary article of the 1795 essay.
Did Immanuel Kant really say this?
The library’s label is Paraphrase or translation. A standard English of the first preliminary article of Toward Perpetual Peace, 1795. Mary Gregor translated the essay in the Cambridge edition. A truce that banks a grievance for the next war is not a peace. This wording is a translation.
Where it comes from
Toward Perpetual Peace, preliminary article 1
Approximate date: 1795.
How to use it
A settlement between two neighbours in Leeds over a fence that includes a quiet plan to reopen the whole boundary at the next survey has the shape he refuses, scaled down from states to a street. The article says the reservation voids the peace as a peace. It does not say the neighbours must like each other; It says a pause that is designed as a loading bay for the next fight should not be given the name.
A mindset reading
Secret reservation is the phrase that matters, and public compromise is not the target. He is not demanding that every treaty solve every historical grief on the day of signing. He is demanding that the signing not include a private intention to treat the pause as preparation; A realist reading that calls this impractical has to say why a peace defined as stored war is a useful idea rather than a delay.
Understand the philosophy
The key term is a preliminary article, a condition that is meant to hold immediately if peace is to be more than a word, as distinct from the definitive articles about republics, a federation of free states, and hospitality. The essay of 1795 is his public proposal, not a prediction that peace is near. Gregor's English, in the Cambridge volume of practical philosophy, is the usual scholarly translation. The first article is about the honesty of the end of a war.
- justice
- society
- power
FAQ
What does it mean?
The usual reading takes the article as a condition of honest peace: a treaty that reserves a claim, a border, a pretext, for the next war is only a truce, and calling it peace corrupts the word. He is writing preliminary articles for states, not a private rule for quarrels, though the structure is clear. A rival reading treats the demand as naive about diplomacy, in which ambiguity is the art. He thinks that art is exactly how wars are stored; The sentence is the first preliminary article of the 1795 essay.
Did Immanuel Kant really say this?
Paraphrase or translation. A standard English of the first preliminary article of Toward Perpetual Peace, 1795. Mary Gregor translated the essay in the Cambridge edition. A truce that banks a grievance for the next war is not a peace. This wording is a translation.
Which work is it in?
Toward Perpetual Peace, preliminary article 1 Approximate date: 1795.