Skip to content

Quotation

Last reviewed:

“The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances: if there is any reaction, both are transformed.”

Paraphrase or translation

Carl Jung · Thinkers beyond philosophy · Modern · 1933

What does it mean?

A real meeting changes both people, and only if there is a reaction. No reaction, no transformation. The usual reading, especially in the essay, is about the doctor and the patient: treatment is not something one person does to another from outside the reaction. A competing reading turns the line into a claim that every acquaintance remakes you, which the 'if' refuses. The sentence is in Modern Man in Search of a Soul, in the psychotherapy essay, and the Collected Works reprint the thought at volume 16, paragraph 163. Chemistry is the metaphor. It is not a theory of romance, though people use it as one.

Did Carl Jung really say this?

The library’s label is Paraphrase or translation. The familiar English of that 1933 essay. Collected Works volume 16, paragraph 163, later gives a close sentence about two personalities meeting as chemical substances are mixed. Wording is not identical. This card follows the book people actually meet, and it is a translation from German.

Where it comes from

Modern Man in Search of a Soul (1933), the essay on the problems of modern psychotherapy, in the Baynes translation

Approximate date: 1933.

How to use it

A supervision in a Sheffield school that leaves the senior person exactly as before has had no reaction in his sense, however long it ran. If both people shift, including the one with the authority, the metaphor has a chance of fitting. It does not make every shift an improvement.

A mindset reading

The condition is the useful part. Quoting the transformation and forgetting the 'if' makes an ordinary conversation look fated.

Understand the philosophy

The essay is about psychotherapy, not about chemistry as a science and not about destiny. The key clause is if there is any reaction. Volume 16, paragraph 163, is the later home of the thought. The shadow paragraphs explain one thing that can be in the reaction: what each person projects.

FAQ

What does it mean?

A real meeting changes both people, and only if there is a reaction. No reaction, no transformation. The usual reading, especially in the essay, is about the doctor and the patient: treatment is not something one person does to another from outside the reaction. A competing reading turns the line into a claim that every acquaintance remakes you, which the 'if' refuses. The sentence is in Modern Man in Search of a Soul, in the psychotherapy essay, and the Collected Works reprint the thought at volume 16, paragraph 163. Chemistry is the metaphor. It is not a theory of romance, though people use it as one.

Did Carl Jung really say this?

Paraphrase or translation. The familiar English of that 1933 essay. Collected Works volume 16, paragraph 163, later gives a close sentence about two personalities meeting as chemical substances are mixed. Wording is not identical. This card follows the book people actually meet, and it is a translation from German.

Which work is it in?

Modern Man in Search of a Soul (1933), the essay on the problems of modern psychotherapy, in the Baynes translation Approximate date: 1933.