Quotation
Last reviewed:
“The idea of God is like the mark of the craftsman stamped on his work.”
René Descartes · Rationalism · Early modern · 1641
What does it mean?
The usual reading takes the image as a step in the Third Meditation's proof: the idea of an infinite, perfect being is not something a finite thinker could have coined, so it functions like a maker's mark showing where the mind came from. A rival reading treats the image as a warm metaphor for religious feeling, detachable from the causal principle he is using, that there must be at least as much reality in the cause as in the effect. The sentence belongs to that argument, not to a separate piety. It remains inside the constraints of the Meditations.
Did René Descartes really say this?
The library’s label is Paraphrase or translation. Cottingham's translation of the Third Meditation, Adam and Tannery volume seven, page 51. The mark is part of an argument that the idea of an infinite God could not have been manufactured by a finite mind. This wording is a translation.
Where it comes from
Meditations III (AT VII 51)
Approximate date: 1641.
How to use it
A maker's stamp on a chair in a workshop in High Wycombe tells you something only if you already trust the link between stamp and workshop. Descartes needs an analogous link between the content of an idea and the reality of its cause, and that link is the part a seminar in a church hall usually skips when it enjoys the image. The image does not replace the principle; It illustrates a principle that can be rejected on its own terms.
A mindset reading
Metaphors in arguments are where readers relax, and this is a bad place to relax. The mark is doing causal work. If the causal principle fails, the craftsman image does not survive as a proof, though it may survive as a picture; Treating every innate-looking idea as a divine stamp would also go beyond what he claims, which is specific to the idea of God.
Understand the philosophy
The key term is the idea of God, an innate idea of a perfect infinite being, which he says a finite mind could not have invented from its own resources. The Third Meditation uses it to prove God's existence and, later, to secure clear and distinct perception against the demon. Cottingham's English keeps the craftsman simile at Adam and Tannery page 51. The argument is one of the most contested in the book, and the image is not milder than the argument.
- knowledge
- meaning
- mind
FAQ
What does it mean?
The usual reading takes the image as a step in the Third Meditation's proof: the idea of an infinite, perfect being is not something a finite thinker could have coined, so it functions like a maker's mark showing where the mind came from. A rival reading treats the image as a warm metaphor for religious feeling, detachable from the causal principle he is using, that there must be at least as much reality in the cause as in the effect. The sentence belongs to that argument, not to a separate piety. It remains inside the constraints of the Meditations.
Did René Descartes really say this?
Paraphrase or translation. Cottingham's translation of the Third Meditation, Adam and Tannery volume seven, page 51. The mark is part of an argument that the idea of an infinite God could not have been manufactured by a finite mind. This wording is a translation.
Which work is it in?
Meditations III (AT VII 51) Approximate date: 1641.